October 08, 2003

Skwonk! 1.2

/oldarchives/schwonk-thumb.jpg
It’s back. The worst app ever written for Mac OS X. Skwonk is an application that will listen to your network interface for traffic. All traffic. Like a traffic monitor. Difference is, Skwonk plays specific sounds for the type of packets that go flying by. For example, if a TCP packet for port 80 goes flying by the network to another Mac, Skwonk can blurt out a belch, or hoot like an owl, etc.

Yet another software snot-rag from John Schilling, that sweaty virtuoso of GRE analogies and useless software, Mr Schilling claims Skwonk to be “the worst” application on OS X. But can this cocksure braggadocio be substantiated? Will our team of discriminating judges emerge from the sweat lodge with bleeding eardrums, or will they painstakingly retrain their much-abused sensory system to enjoy the occasionally mellifluous braying? Let’s find out.

Built with REALbasic, Mr. Schilling has an excellent start on his goal of arriving at the zenith of badness. With a convenient “double-clickable” application icon, we were somewhat disappointed in the relative ease with which we launched this hair-festooned lard crumpet.

Skwonk comes with several sounds to get you started, and offers a convenient interface for assigning a distinct sound to each protocol. We recommend also downloading the barnyard noises pack, which will place this mighty battery of sonic delights under your direct command:

  • Chicken (clucking)
  • Crickets (chirping)
  • Horse (whinny)
  • Moo (regular)
  • Moo (with bells)
  • Owl (hooting)
  • Pig (orgasmic)
  • Rooster (crowing)
  • Sheep (somewhat uneasy)
  • Wolf (signaling presence of sheep)

Once properly configured, a mighty cacophony of animal wails emits from the speakers when the merest trickling of network activity is generated. This loathsomely noisome nonmusical noise is best classified as highly disruptive, much like the discovery of egret droppings in the bran flakes disrupts one’s ordinarily sedate morning routine.

At this juncture, we feel it is important to remind our readers that many species of small flying beetles can in fact bite humans, although they only rarely swarm all over your body and nibble you to death. We would also like to remind Mr. Schilling that offering manual volume controls in a purportedly useless application may lead to persons unknown to developing actual uses for this dreadnought of network monitoring utilities. Skwonk’s inescapable about box is a pathetic gambit — we’ve seen that one a million times before. Given our survival and barely noticeable scarring after running Skwonk for fifteen minutes, we award a 10.8, making Skwonk not quite the worst application on Mac OS X.

Download Skwonk

Posted by ladd at October 8, 2003 03:42 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Comments are for wimps. Proof shown below.

Posted by: Norm O. Tidwell on October 8, 2003 04:00 PM

I was thinking of rewriting this in Cocoa, but I realize now that might lower my coveted 10.8 rating.

Posted by: John Schilling on October 8, 2003 04:28 PM

turd post!

Posted by: Nick on October 8, 2003 06:02 PM

Does Norm posting "Comments are for wimps. Proof shown below." constitue a comment? I'm just asking for Norm's sake.

I'm not real savvy when it comes to networks, but it seems to me that this program would pretty much be making noise all the time. That is also the impression that I got from reading the wordy review. I wonder, then, that, if configured properly and used in conjunction with a friend or ally, could you possibly make "music"? If you have the tones set and you have a friend pull stuff across the network then you would have, esentially, musical file sharing. Which, when played with lots of alcohol, makes for a rousing replacement for the lackluster musical chairs.

Just a thought. Actually it's several.

Posted by: Nick on October 8, 2003 06:34 PM

This is not a comment as defined by Websters dictionary, but it might be depending upon how you look at it.

Posted by: Laemkral on October 8, 2003 07:10 PM

This however is a comment, as it makes note of the fact that the above sentence may or may not be a comment.

Posted by: Laemkral on October 8, 2003 07:11 PM

Hmmm...tested out Skwonk, and I must say that the 10.8 is highly over rated. Maybe you have tons of network traffic more than me, VanTols, but it really wasn't that bad. Almost relaxing....
Well, anyways...I'd give it less than a 10 for the simple fact that for it to acheive true annoyingness it should be installed on a computer turned into a router....

Posted by: Laemkral on October 8, 2003 07:36 PM

The crickets are nice.

Posted by: Nick on October 8, 2003 11:04 PM

Wow, a review that has so many mentions of farm animals-- and yet a comments section I could bring home to mother!
I'm impressed and dissapointed!

Posted by: Taffy Time on October 9, 2003 10:15 AM

What species of animal is a MOO? And what do they sound like? And why on earth would they need bells? Does a moo taste like chicken? Inquiring readers WANT TO KNOW!

Posted by: Mickey Knox on October 9, 2003 10:35 AM

MOO sounds like POO. This is a job for Norm!

Posted by: Norm O. Tidwell on October 9, 2003 10:54 AM

Egret droppings? And all those years, I believed my mom when she told me those were raisins in my cereal.

Posted by: Robo on October 9, 2003 11:15 AM

Mickey,

Why don't you leave the inquiring to The Inquis, er, professionals. I am setting up a play date for you with one of our "Fun" teams.

Fun is a euphemism.

Carry on.

Posted by: Nick on October 9, 2003 01:21 PM

I'm liking the new arrangement of PvT. The links and stuff being on the right is somewhat easier to the eyes, and besides. Everyone does it on the left, so bravo for standing out. And why IS it labeled as Moo? Is it so hard to type out cow? Same number of letters! Oh, I get it. They couldn't spend the extra fraction of a millisecond to move their finger over to a new letter rather than just hitting the same one twice. Lazy pukes. I oughta turn them into fetal pigs and then dissect them as I call them Mr. Bigglesworth. What ever happened to him anyways? I don't recall seeing him in Goldmember...

Posted by: Laemkral on October 9, 2003 02:38 PM
Post a comment